Www dating lttalk
I am so confused and am scared I could face jail time. We had both been drinking, and yes these are all older charges. I do believe you are in a better position because they only evidence the government has is a police officer's testimony that your boyfriend had scratches. There are a lot of good public defenders and private lawyers.I became upset because the police told me I was lying about his scratches, and I had not laid a hand on him. It left no mark, but they did not check my body for the bruises and scratches he left on me. They can not prove their case based solely on that unless the police allege that you "admitted" to striking your boyfriend. So when I asked why I was not examined myself, the female officers saidd I needed to call and talk to the Field Lt. Or does it look good to immediately be challenging this? There are also a lot of bad lawyers and bad public defenders. One thing to consider, PD's know the judge and the court b/c they deal with them everyday.
Your opinion on what's best for Marines TODAY holds little value, just like if I went on a rant about how nasty Marines used to look in uniform a couple decades ago..means absolutely nothing.
We don't wear any uniform where your collar bone is showing, unless you go t-shirt less in Charlies, which is something that is only done by weird ass 50 yr old Colonels. I would try a different recruiter, unless MEPS disqualified you. Hell, I'd drive up there on my own just for the doc-man to look at it. The previous order stated "cannot be visible in PT gear" while the new order somewhat goes over the line and puts a limit on total tattoos for enlisted going officer.
My recruiter had me try on a v-neck button up in which the top of my eagle's head and the words above it were poking out. That may be a possibility but they were talking about how it was on the collar bone and how my recruiter's boss had someone come in earlier with the same problem except his was much smaller. It seems to me that the recruiter said "no" without any official MEPS documentation, no? My disclaimer, I have not read the new order, but it's always been "cannot be visible in green on green" ie: green skivvy, green shorts, pt gear The previous order stated "cannot be visible in PT gear" while the new order somewhat goes over the line and puts a limit on total tattoos for enlisted going officer.
Any tatoo larger than a dollar bill should be reason for DQ. If they all jumped off a cliff and died, i suppose it would be OK if the rest of the sheep followed their example.:evilgrin::flag: I always thought being a Marine and having tattoos went hand in hand. I was around long before the Marine Corps had regulations about tatoos and I for one think it is good that the Corps is trying to clean up the tatoo image.
I can remember when guys had most of their bodies covered with nothing but crap that had nothing to to with the Marine Corps.
Search for www dating lttalk:
I was suppose to going up to MEPS yesterday but we stopped at my recruiter's boss's office in Lexington and he took a look at my tattoo and immediately disqualified me. Chances are likely that it'll change eventually, but changing in the next 5 years? It seems to me that the recruiter said "no" without any official MEPS documentation, no?